Unlock the Editor’s Digest at no cost
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly e-newsletter.
FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried is anticipated to start testifying in his personal defence on Thursday, after the federal government rests its case within the legal trial over the collapse of his cryptocurrency empire.
The uncommon transfer by the 31-year-old, who faces the prospect of a lifetime behind bars if convicted on expenses together with wire fraud and cash laundering, comes after a New York jury heard a number of days’ price of damning testimony from Bankman-Fried’s former colleagues and mates, as effectively from his ex-girlfriend Caroline Ellison, who pleaded responsible final 12 months and agreed to co-operate with the federal government.
Defence attorneys are likely to advise shoppers in opposition to testifying, frightened of direct questioning from prosecutors. However Bankman-Fried has been eager to current his aspect of the story ever since crypto trade FTX collapsed with a multibillion-dollar gap in its stability sheet final November. He has granted a number of interviews to journalists and the creator Michael Lewis from his mother and father’ Californian residence earlier than he was jailed for breaching his bail circumstances this summer time.
After being sworn in, Bankman-Fried will first reply questions underneath oath from his personal legal professionals earlier than being cross-examined by prosecutors.
Attorneys for Bankman-Fried are prone to attempt to elicit testimony during which the previous entrepreneur — who has lengthy claimed he was amassing wealth with a purpose to ultimately give it away to charitable causes — underlines he was performing in “good religion” earlier than being caught unawares by a pointy downturn within the crypto market and being smeared by a competitor.
“If he will get on the stand and seems unbelievable or untrustworthy — or extraordinarily plausible, and also you see a extremely sympathetic human aspect to him — that may very well be game-changing,” stated Rachel Maimin, a former federal prosecutor within the US lawyer’s workplace that charged Bankman-Fried, who’s now in non-public follow at Lowenstein Sandler.
“In a case like this the place the entire complete case rotates round [Bankman-Fried’s] frame of mind and his intent, no one is ready to testify to that higher than the particular person himself,” she added. If jurors are satisfied, “it will likely be an important proof within the case”.
In a letter to the choose final week, Bankman-Fried’s legal professionals additionally raised issues that he was not receiving doses of Adderall, a drug used to deal with attention-deficit hyperactivity dysfunction, whereas he’s in courtroom, arguing that this is able to impair his capability to testify in his personal defence. The courtroom subsequently heard the medicine subject had been resolved.